20 Things I Wish Vaccine Junkies Would Admit

Brilliant –

Levi Quackenboss


  1. Not all of the diseases we vaccinate children for are serious or appropriate.  Many of them are a matter of inconvenience and some are for manufactured epidemics: Hep B, HPV, chickenpox, flu.  This isn’t to minimize the rare adult or child death from chickenpox but that number is 1/40th of the deaths from vaccine-induced SIDS.
  2. Immunity from vaccines doesn’t last forever. Most adults would be considered “unvaccinated” today for everything but the viral diseases they naturally acquired. Even if you buy into the theory of herd immunity, most of our herd is not immune.
  3. True herd immunity is based on animals that naturally acquired viral disease.  Oftentimes immunity comes from eating the herd members that died from the disease or putting their diarrhea into feed. Farmers know that herd immunity isn’t based on vaccination.
  4. You are not really vaccinating your newborn child for…

View original post 867 more words


Peanut Allergies and Vaccines


From How to Cause a Peanut Allergy Epidemic in 4 Easy Steps on The Thinking Moms’ Revolution:

“The most infuriating part of Ms. Fraser’s book is the light she shines into the dark corners of the “search for the cause” of the peanut allergy epidemic. She exposes the game of The Emperor Has No Clothes that has been played between pharmaceutical companies and the governments of the western world for at least the last 85 years. It is only acceptable — and, in fact, of utmost importance — to research a source of any epidemic as long as it is not vaccines, because the fact that vaccines are proven to be safe is unquestionable.

I know from my own research that the non-stop pressure to shout about vaccine safety from the rooftops is levied on the media by the pharmaceutical companies who pay advertising revenue for top-selling drugs, like those for erectile dysfunction or to chemically lower cholesterol. That pressure has birthed the media trend of promoting “blame the mother” research — blame her not only for what she ate while pregnant that caused an anaphylactic child, but for taking a dose of Tylenol while pregnant and causing ADHD in her child, or for catching the flu while pregnant and causing autism in her child.”

Read the post whole post on TMR.  It’s enlightening, to say the least.

“You Simply Have To Be Pro-Health” by Barry Segal

This is an excellent, sensible, wonderful, insightful essay –


“Like I’ve said in the past, I’m pro-health. If a safe and effective vaccine accomplishes that, then I’m pro-vaccine. But the burden of proof is on those who recommend vaccines to prove they are safe and effective. That is not happening. We have to protect our “vulnerable children.” We need transparency, we need third-party testing, and we need a sense of urgency. We need to recapture the trust we once had in our government’s ability to protect us from the short-sighted profit-taking nature of corporations that both manufacture and test these products. Somebody has to be held accountable.”

Doctors Ignore Data on Premies by Dr. Kelly Brogan

I recommend that you read, “Doctors Ignore Data on Premies” by Dr. Kelly Brogan.  It starts:

I am not reporting today on the alarming results of a new JAMA study called Adverse Events After Routine Immunization of Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants for reasons related to my passion for women and children’s right to health freedom. I am reporting on this because it is one of the most egregious example of dogma resistant to truth.

I have called this anosognosia or lack of awareness of a deficit.

This deficiency may be largely because of mass conditioning and the efforts on the part of industry to paper over the truth when it does emerge with strategic tactics, and a pile of funded and manipulated counter-“data”. For this reason, it is critical, when consulting the literature, to consider the following:

  • who funded the study
  • was a proper placebo used
  • what did the results show

Because author conclusions are efforts to hedge and protect themselves, vanishingly few studies that reveal the adverse effects of pharmaceuticals come out and support what their own data actually states.

More can be found at http://kellybroganmd.com/snippet/tiniest-ones-doctors-ignore-data-premies/


Pushing a False Dichotomy on Vaccines

Read this… and the rest of iDSENT. It’s a brilliant blog.


At the end of her commentary on U.S. Congressman Bill Posey’s July 29, 2015 statement on the floor of the House of Representatives regarding whistleblower Dr. William Thompson’s allegations of fraud against the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) involving a CDC study on the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine and possible links to autism, investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson writes:

One final note: Rep. Posey unequivocally states that he is pro-vaccine. However, the propaganda campaign typically falsely portrays anyone who addresses vaccine safety issues as “anti-vaccine.”1

It’s an interesting point, and one which goes to the heart of the debate on vaccines and vaccination policy in the United States. Think about it. If a person expresses any doubt whatsoever about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, any vaccine, he or she automatically runs the risk of being pigeonholed as an “anti-vaxer.”

In a nutshell, the idea is that

View original post 781 more words

CDC Whistleblower


If you think that Dr. William Thompson’s revelations of fraud at the CDC aren’t worth media attention and a Congressional hearing, you’re probably a vaccine zealot.

Dr. William Thompson is a senior scientist at the CDC who has worked there since 1998.  He admitted, and documented, that he and others at the CDC manipulated and omitted data about vaccine safety.  In his August 27, 2014 statement, Dr. Thompson said:

“I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.”

Post-collection data manipulation is a serious violation of ethics and scientific best practices.  Apparently, violating ethics and scientific best practices is something that is commonplace within the CDC, as Dr. Thompson also stated:

“That’s the deal . . ., that’s what I keep seeing again and again and again . . . where these senior people [at the CDC] just do completely unethical, vile things and no one holds them accountable.” — Dr. William Thompson to Dr. Brian Hooker in a recorded phone call, June 12, 2014

Congressman Bill Posey read the following statement from Dr. Thompson on the floor of the U.S. Congress on July 29, 2015:

“All the authors and I met and decided sometime between August-September 02 not to report any race-effects for the paper. Sometime soon after the meeting we decided to exclude reporting any race-effects. The coauthors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The remaining four coauthors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had and thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can. However, because I assumed that it was illegal and would violate both FOIA and DOJ requests, I kept hard copies of all documents in my office and I retain all associated computer files. I believe we intentionally withheld controversial findings from a final draft of a pediatrics paper.”

Intentionally withholding controversial findings about vaccine safety IS WRONG.  Everyone at the CDC knows that it’s wrong to destroy and manipulate evidence, yet they did it anyhow.

I commend Dr. Thompson, Congressman Posey, and everyone else who is screaming about this travesty.  I hear the screams about the #CDCWhistleblower because I listen to people who question the relationship between vaccines and the diseases of modernity (including, but not limited to, autism).  But I doubt that the people who don’t subscribe to email updates from The Thinking Moms’ Revolution and similar sites have a clue who Dr. Thompson is or what he has said, because the mainstream media has been silent about Dr. Thompson’s allegations and Representative Posey’s testimony.

The silence of the media, and the lack of other Congressional Representatives voicing support for Representative Posey, is both deafening and disgusting.

The media, the politicians, and a large portion of the American public are showing that they SIMPLY DON’T CARE about vaccine safety.  They DON’T CARE about ethics.  They DON’T CARE about data manipulation.  They DON’T CARE about truth.  The truth doesn’t matter.  What matters are their beliefs:  Vaccines are safe.  Vaccines save lives.  Vaccines have made the world a safer place.  Vaccines cannot, and will not ever, hurt anyone.  Vaccines are good.

It doesn’t matter what evidence they are presented with to the contrary.  It doesn’t matter that not all vaccines are the same.  It doesn’t matter that people are chronically ill at rates never before seen in human history.  It doesn’t matter how many children are hurt by vaccines.  They hold onto their beliefs with passion, with zeal.  Reason, and science, have nothing to do with their beliefs–though they claim that their beliefs are based in both science and reason.

If facts and truth mattered to vaccine proponents, they would be clamoring for a Congressional hearing for Dr. Thompson.  They’re not though.  Because Dr. Thompson may have something to say that will challenge their beliefs.

If you’re not interested in hearing what Dr. Thompson has to say, you are certainly a Vax Zealot.  Listen to him, and you might learn something.